← Back to Insights
August 25, 2020
Fixing Healthcare Would Be Easy If It Wasn’t So Hard
Authors
David Burda
Topics
Economics Innovation Outcomes
Channels
Blogs

Fixing Healthcare Would Be Easy If It Wasn’t So Hard

Fixing healthcare is very easy and extremely difficult at the same time. That dichotomy is what gives the status quo staying power. A few things that came out over the past week or so illustrate the point.

Let’s start with the extremely difficult part.

The Pew Charitable Trusts and the American Medical Association polled 1,550 primary-care physicians on what they thought about antibiotic stewardship, which is the appropriate use of antibiotics to both treat patients effectively and prevent an increase in antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Pew and the AMA surveyed the PCPs from August through October 2018, and they released the survey results in a 26-page report on Aug. 6. You can download the report here.

On the plus side:

  • 93 percent said they agree or strongly agree that antibiotic-resistance is a problem in the U.S.
  • 91 percent said they agree or strongly agree that inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is a problem in outpatient healthcare settings like primary-care practices
  • 91 percent said it was appropriate, very appropriate or extremely appropriate for office-based medical practices like primary-care practices to have antibiotic stewardship program
  • 65 percent said they’ve seen an increase in antibiotic-resistant infections among their patients over the past five years

But on the head-scratching side:

  • 84 percent said they feel moderate, high or very high pressure from patients or patients’ parents to prescribe antibiotics
  • 60 percent said they prescribe antibiotics more appropriately than their peers
  • 55 percent said antibiotic resistance is a problem in their own practice
  • 37 percent said inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is a problem in their own practice

What most PCPs are saying is, the appropriate use of antibiotics is a problem, but it’s not their problem.

“This lack of recognition of their own contributions to resistance and inappropriate prescribing presents a barrier to the implementation of stewardship efforts,” the report said.

Now let’s jump over to the very easy part.

UnitedHealthcare, the nation’s largest health insurer, released research that said PCPs that it pays under global capitation contracts score higher on important quality measures than PCPs that it pays under fee-for-service contracts. UnitedHealthcare released the research on Aug. 11, and you can download it here.

Global capitation contracts pay PCPs a fixed dollar amount per patient per month. FFS contracts, on-the-other-hand, pay PCPs a fee based the care provided to the patient at the point of service.

UnitedHealthcare said PCPs under capitation contracts screened 80 percent of their female patients for breast cancer compared with 74 percent by PCPs under FFS contracts. It was 82 percent compared with 74 percent for colon cancer screenings. It was 89 percent compared with 80 percent for patients having their blood sugar levels under control. And so on.

UnitedHealthcare released the study results in a press release, not in a study in a peer-reviewed medical journal. Take them for what they’re worth.

Let’s also not pretend UnitedHealthcare is doing this for members or any other altruistic reason. It’s doing this to make more money for shareholders. Healthier patients file fewer medical claims. You can bet actuaries figured out the ROI in capitated payments to doctors measured in lower medical costs.

Still, what UnitedHealthcare is doing proves the point. Primary-care practices are healthcare businesses just like businesses in any other industry. They respond to financial incentives. If you want them to do the right things, pay them to do the right things.

What would make PCPs implement an antibiotic stewardship program? Money.

Forty-two percent of the PCPs surveyed by Pew and the AMA said it would be very likely or extremely likely they would implement a program if a public or private payer created an incentive program that would pay them extra for antibiotic stewardship.

Like I said, fixing healthcare would be very easy if it wasn’t extremely difficult.

To learn more about this topic, please read “Will Misuse of Antibiotics Respond to Regulation?” on 4sighthealth.com.

Thanks for reading.

Stay home. Stay safe. Stay alive.

About the Author

David Burda

David Burda began covering healthcare in 1983 and hasn’t stopped since. Dave writes this monthly column “Burda on Healthcare,” contributes weekly blog posts, manages our weekly newsletter 4sight Friday, and hosts our weekly Roundup podcast. Dave believes that healthcare is a business like any other business, and customers — patients — are king. If you do what’s right for patients, good business results will follow.

Dave’s personnel experiences with the healthcare system both as a patient and family caregiver have shaped his point of view. It’s also been shaped by covering the industry for 40 years as a reporter and editor. He worked at Modern Healthcare for 25 years, the last 11 as editor.

Prior to Modern Healthcare, he did stints at the American Medical Record Association (now AHIMA) and the American Hospital Association. After Modern Healthcare, he wrote a monthly column for Twin Cities Business explaining healthcare trends to a business audience, and he developed and executed content marketing plans for leading healthcare corporations as the editorial director for healthcare strategies at MSP Communications.

When he’s not reading and writing about healthcare, Dave spends his time riding the trails of DuPage County, IL, on his bike, tending his vegetable garden and daydreaming about being a lobster fisherman in Maine. He lives in Wheaton, IL, with his lovely wife of 40 years and his three children, none of whom want to be journalists or lobster fishermen.

Recent Posts

Uncategorized
4sight Friday 11/22/24
4sight Friday | The Next Four Years of Alternative Payment Models | Can RFK Jr. Really Make Us… Read More
By November 22, 2024
Outcomes
Podcast: What Direction Will Alternative Payment Models Head Over the Next Four Years? 11/21/24
We talked about the future of Alternative Payment Models (APMs) under a Trump administration based on the latest… Read More
By November 21, 2024
Economics
AMA Draws Blood With Policy on Hospital Tax Exemptions
There are certain lines you don’t cross, even when you point the finger at another healthcare industry sector… Read More
By November 20, 2024